Saturday, May 2, 2015

Patients Using Statins Especially Simvastatin Have Lower Cancer-Specific Mortality Rates

Patients Using Statins Especially Simvastatin Have Lower Cancer-Specific Mortality Rates

A population-based cohort study to investigate whether statin users had reduced risk of lung cancer-specific mortality has provided evidence that lung cancer patient who used statins, and particularly simvastatin, have reduced rates of cancer-specific mortality.

Newly diagnosed lung cancer patients (~14000), from 1998 to 2009, were identified from English cancer registry data and linked to the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, providing prescription records, and to Office of National Statistics mortality data up to 2012. Cox regression models were used to calculate HRs for cancer-specific mortality and 95% confidence intervals (CI) by statin use before and after diagnosis, and to adjust these HRs for potential confounders.

Following are the findings:

1. In 3,638 lung cancer patients, there was some evidence that statin use after diagnosis was associated with reduced lung cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78-1.02; P = 0.09).

2. Associations were more marked after 12 prescriptions (adjusted HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98; P = 0.03) and when lipophilic statins were investigated (adjusted HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94; P = 0.01), but were attenuated in some sensitivity analyses.

3. In 11,051 lung cancer patients, statin use before diagnosis was associated with reduced lung cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83–0.93; P less than 0.001).

The authors conclude as “there was some evidence that lung cancer patients who used statins, and particularly simvastatin, had reduced rates of cancer-specific mortality”. They also suggest conducting randomized controlled trials of simvastatin as adjuvant cancer therapy in lung cancer patients.


Article citation:  Cardwell, C. R.; et. al. Statin Use and Survival from Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015, 24(5), 833–841.